[KC] Diplomatic Immunity and the possible capture of a King

[Hunter Johnson]

If you didn't capture the King or leave him in checkmate, then your move didn't violate the Checkmate Rule.  Looks fine to me.
 
-- 
J. Hunter Johnson <><
http://www.hunterandlori.com 


----- Original Message ----
From: Kevin dylo dylo <armordylo at hotmail.com>
To: knightmare-list at sjgames.com
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:44:17 PM
Subject: [KC] Diplomatic Immunity and the possible capture of a King


After following so many of these messages, I think I know the answer, but 
thought I'd check.

I thought I had a great move, ignoring for one turn Uusing Diplomatice 
Immunity) the Paladin on my Knight.  The Paladin was situated so that when I 
ignored the Continuing Effect it could capture my opponent's Queen, but it 
also would have allowed me to capture his King.

I didn't even consider that move, going straight for the Queen. My opponent 
says this is highly suspect.

If I can't do this, how do we proceed? Return the Queen, return my Paladin, 
and forefeit the Diplomatic Immunity since I played it, and try some other 
move?

Thanks!


_______________________________________________
Knightmare-list mailing list
Knightmare-list at sjgames.com
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/knightmare-list