IN> Grigori Reproduction (Re: APG Errata Submitted)

[Jonathan Lang]

Elizabeth McCoy wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> >IPG pp. 84-86 should probably receive similar Errata.  [...]
>
> Oh, it will. I'm mostly waiting for the APG errata to go up, so that
> I can then say, "To bring the IPG into line with the APG errata..."

Aha... :)

Out of curiosity, did the APG errata address or remove the issue of
whether or not Grigori can create other Grigori without Superior
assistance, or is that unchanged?  (I'm operating on the assumption
that celestial procreation such as this is something that generally
takes place in the Celestial Realm - but even when it occurs on Earth,
the Vessels are incidental at best; indeed, it wouldn't bother me if
the process works better if - or possibly even requires that - the
prospective parents are in celestial form.

Personally, I think that it's reasonable to assume:

1. if two human bodies procreate, the result should be a human;
2. A Grigori vessel is as good as a human body for this purpose;
and thus
3. if two Grigori vessels procreate, the result should be a human.

I'd bump the odds of a Nephallum up from one-in-three in this case (to
one-in-two, two-in-three, or a certainty; I'm not sure which); but I'd
otherwise leave things be.  Thus, the only way to create a new Grigori
would be to have a Superior assemble one - just like any other angel.

The other route to take would be that you need to have at least one
honest-to-goodness human body in the mix; two Grigori vessels can't
conceive a child.

-- 
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang