[gurps] Ver 1.1 TL6 Small Zeppelin
Onno Meyer
Onno.Meyer at gmx.de
Mon Jul 7 12:48:16 CDT 2008
I list volumes in the body as Vol0 and volumes in Pod 2 or 3
as Vol23. View monospaced :-)
Item Weight Cost Vol0 Vol1 Vol23 Vol4
2*194 kW prop 286.8 $1,434 -
388 kW prop 259.8 $1,299 -
lifting gas $49,440.51 706,293
long-range com 100 $600 2
nav instruments 20 $500 0.4
3 bridge RCS 120 $300 360
1 RCS 40 $100 40
8 NCS 240 $800 60 60 30 60
21 superior RS 840 $2,100 1,680
8 NS 240 $800 240
4 hammocks 400 $80 400
2 C toilets 80 $400 80
galley 3,000 $1,900 400
4*194 kW engine 2,388 $19,104 23.88 47.76
battery 45 $22.5 0.225
generator 100 $400
fuel tank 121.5 $8,100 115.5 1.5 3
ballast tank 195 $13,000 195
access space 4,500
cargo space 60
I guess your pod volumes were the actual values, too. Adding
volume is always possible ...
> The rules on sealing and lifting gases are both confusing and produce
> absurd results.
I'd call them simplified, not confusing ...
* You have a "lifting gas" component. This component has a
cost, volume and effectively negative weight.
* This component can go either into a (non-rigid) gasbag or
into a faction of a (rigid) hull. Sealing a hull pays for
internal gas-tight partitions (read gas cells).
> "Lifting gas can go in a gasbag subassembly outside the vehicle, or in
> a sealed body or pod." I'm trying to model a gasbag inside a body. I
> can see requiring a sealed body for a "metalclad" where a gas-tight
> metal shell is both body and gas container. Applying a seal to the
> main body of the Bodensee would cost $20 million, 99.9 percent the
> cost of the vehicle.
That one is the true killer. But on the other hand the hull
is rather cheap compared to, say, a ship.
More information about the GurpsNet-L
mailing list